In recent years, the management of Material Non-Public Information (MNPI) has emerged as a significant concern within the compliance sphere. Regulatory bodies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and globally are intensifying their scrutiny, targeting insufficient insider trading compliance policies, market abuse, and ineffective management of insider information.
Firms are under increasing pressure to implement comprehensive and actionable policies and procedures to manage MNPI and insider lists effectively, with the goal of minimizing the risk of hefty fines and regulatory actions.
MCO (My Compliance Office), a provider of integrated compliance software, has delved into why MNPI is still a high risk area for compliance.
It stated that recent enforcement actions highlight the ongoing challenges faced by compliance teams in tackling insider trading and the misuse of MNPI. The regulatory environment is dynamic, with no signs of the scrutiny abating. As a result, it’s not only a regulatory expectation but also a business imperative for firms to adopt the latest compliance technology. This technology is crucial for managing employee personal trading compliance and preventing the potential misuse of insider information. The stakes are high, with significant penalties for trading violations and misuse of insider information across the globe. Firms need to maintain vigilant oversight of employee access to MNPI, identifying potential risk areas proactively to safeguard their brand, reputation, and bottom line.
In 2023 alone, a series of punitive measures were enacted. For instance, the SEC imposed penalties totaling $1,173,926 on a broker-dealer for insider trading, marking the second such instance. A London-based investment banking firm faced a £2,837,600 fine by the FCA for inadequate systems and controls to manage the risk of financial crimes like fraudulent trading. Moreover, a real estate investment trust was fined €350,000 by the AMF for failing to maintain and update insider lists, with associated penalties exceeding €2.4 million for individuals involved in insider dealing.
Material Non-Public Information (MNPI) is defined as information not widely disseminated to the public or available to investors, which could influence an investor’s decision to buy, sell, or hold securities. This includes strategic plans, capital investment plans, acquisition negotiations, and more. An example of the misuse of MNPI is the illegal trading based on prior knowledge of a CEO’s resignation, a month before it was publicly announced.
The concept of insider trading refers to the illegal buying or selling of securities based on MNPI, breaching a fiduciary duty or other relationships of trust. An example of insider trading is a high-level employee trading shares based on confidential information about a company merger or sale. With many employees working remotely, the challenge of monitoring for insider trading has intensified, necessitating robust monitoring and compliance measures.
Regulatory bodies like the SEC, FCA, BaFin, and AMF are increasingly leveraging advanced technology to detect insider trading, misuse of insider information, and market abuse. Firms are expected to keep pace, demonstrating proactive management of access to MNPI and compliance with employee personal account dealing. Solutions like MyComplianceOffice offer sophisticated tools to manage regulatory guidelines, identify potential conflicts of interest, automate MNPI and insider trading policies, and streamline insider list management. These automated solutions support standardized data management formats, aligning with regulatory guidelines and ensuring firms remain compliant in this high-stakes environment.
Read the story here.
Keep up with all the latest FinTech news here.
Copyright © 2023 FinTech Global
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
