Novatus Global recently dug deeper into how firms can navigate the future of sustainable finance follow the SFDR’s recent consultations.
The European Commission has ushered in a significant phase in the realm of sustainable finance by initiating comprehensive consultations aimed at refining the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).
These consultations are centered on pivotal enhancements vital to the existing protocol. Specifically, they address the urgent need to counteract greenwashing, refine SFDR reporting mechanisms, reassess entity-specific disclosures, and establish definitive labelling for sustainable products.
In an effort to combat the pervasive issue of greenwashing, the consultations propose precise fund naming and marketing strategies for sustainable finance. Enhanced digitalisation is also on the agenda, with a push for more streamlined, digitally compatible disclosure and submission processes. Another noteworthy topic of discussion is the optimisation of Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) reporting, with a strategic shift from fund-level to entity-level reporting, thereby amplifying transparency and accountability.
Addressing a glaring market need, the consultations delve into the categorisation of sustainable products. The aim is to either align with the existing framework or introduce a transformative approach that completely redefines the current reporting standards. This initiative marks a significant step in standardising sustainable finance products and preventing market misinformation.
Recently, the Commission’s webinar provided a dynamic platform for discourse on these crucial SFDR consultations. The event illuminated the implementation timeline and offered market participants critical insights from the discussions. However, the response from attendees underscored a prevailing sense of confusion, with a significant majority expressing concern that current SFDR disclosures might be contributing to greenwashing. The comprehensive survey also revealed a strong inclination towards inclusive product categories and a preference for building on existing regulatory articles.
The webinar welcomed a diverse panel, featuring representatives from various sectors including industry bodies, National Competent Authorities (NCAs), and European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs). The discussions spanned several crucial areas, emphasising the need for heightened support for retail investors and advocating for equal footing in the market, especially concerning cost implications for sustainable funds.
A consensus among the panel highlighted the SFDR’s role in fostering transparency and facilitating the transition to a low-carbon economy. However, opinions diverged on its effectiveness in capital mobilisation for environmental goals. The debate extended to the necessity of clear-cut minimum standards for labelling and disclosures within the SFDR regulation and confronting the prevalent issue of greenwashing, especially concerning the nuances between Article 6 and 8 products.
The session also broached the subject of the ‘sustainable investment’ definition within Article 2(17) of the SFDR, acknowledging the industry’s mixed interpretation. The lively debate underscored the need for a more unified understanding, potentially aligning with existing Taxonomies, while others advocated for maintaining definitional flexibility to spur innovation and product differentiation.
Currently, all eyes are on the Commission as the market anticipates the next steps following the consultations. The immediate focus is on concluding these discussions and formulating a document that encapsulates the feedback, serving as a guide for the forthcoming revisions in the SFDR framework.
Read the full post here.
Copyright © 2023 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
