The Australian Government recently unveiled a consultation aimed at overhauling its AML and CTF strategies.
According to Napier AI, the primary goal of these proposed reforms is to align with the international standards mandated by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The reforms are designed to enhance the effectiveness of the existing regime and reduce the regulatory burden by simplifying, modernising, and clarifying it.
These changes are expected to simplify compliance for businesses, adapting to evolving business structures and technological advancements across the economy.
Among several discussion papers, Napier AI provided feedback specifically on Paper 5 titled ‘Broader reforms to simplify, clarify and modernise the regime’. This paper suggests replacing the existing stringent AML/CTF program and Customer Due Diligence (CDD) requirements with more flexible, risk-based, and outcomes-focused obligations.
It also proposes enhancements to facilitate better information sharing and risk management practices.
One of the key proposals is the transformation of the ‘designated business group’ concept into streamlined ‘business groups’. This change aims to lessen complex compliance requirements and foster improved information exchange among group members.
Napier AI has expressed support for these changes, recognising the potential to alleviate the interpretative challenges businesses face with complex regulations, and to assist regulated entities in understanding their compliance targets.
However, while this reform might reduce costs for smaller organisations, the approach necessitates a careful evaluation of compliance needs. Effective information sharing within business groups requires appropriate policies and controls to manage diverse ecosystems that include different structures, risk levels, and data privacy concerns.
Without proper management, businesses may adopt a ‘lowest common denominator’ risk approach, potentially overlooking specific local risks, which could lead to non-compliance and reputational damage.
The extent and scope of information sharing within these new structures need to be meticulously planned to safeguard financial data appropriately. It is advisable to tailor compliance frameworks, policies, and procedures according to the specific industries and company sizes involved. This could be efficiently managed through a multi-organisational, multi-configuration AML solution that allows for adaptable permissions and controls.
Implementing a multi-organisation, multi-screening configuration for AML solutions could provide differentiated risk management controls across a group’s diverse business units, helping maintain varying risk appetites while complying with information security and regulatory requirements.
Standardised reporting protocols would further simplify administrative processes and reduce the complexity of compliance, significantly lowering the total cost of ownership for these systems.
The department has also highlighted issues with the current CDD framework, noting its complexity and procedural focus despite being a core element of the AML/CTF regime. The proposed reforms aim to streamline these core obligations, shifting focus from procedural compliance to outcome-focused measures. This shift encourages organisations to proactively engage in combating financial crimes rather than merely ticking compliance boxes.
Napier AI advocates for a multi-faceted, continuous, real-time approach to customer due diligence through what they term as Perpetual Client Risk Assessment (PCRA). This approach integrates real-time data from various risk events such as screenings, monitoring, and CDD activities, providing a comprehensive view of a client’s risk profile throughout their relationship with a business.
Such dynamic tools help organisations achieve a holistic, real-time evaluation of financial crime risks, tailored to each client and in accordance with the organisation’s risk policies and regulations.
Copyright © 2024 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
