Bias in AI is currently a hot topic in the media and among regulators and industry experts.
According to 4CRisk.ai, this focus is driven by concerns about generative AI models and algorithms producing distorted results, which include reinforced gender and racial stereotypes, and skewed demographic representations in their analyses, recommendations, and predictions. To garner trust, it’s crucial to address and eliminate biases within these models and algorithms.
Some level of bias in AI can seem inevitable. Large Language Models (LLMs) train on historical data, which may contain inherent biases. These biases can range from the exclusion of underrepresented groups, leading to racial, age, or gender biases, to more subtle yet profound biases embedded within the algorithms’ weighting factors.
This can lead to skewed outputs that influence perceptions and decisions, perpetuating the very biases we aim to eliminate with technology perceived as ‘objective’.
A recent academic study, focusing on AI-generated faces, underscored how popular generative models like Stable Diffusion can perpetuate gender stereotypes and racial homogenization by underrepresenting certain races in searches and analyses.
Such revelations raise questions about the need for academic investigations to compel organizations to address hidden biases in their AI models.
The consequences of AI biases are significant. They not only undermine trust among stakeholders, consumers, and partners who rely on the accuracy and explainability of AI outputs but also expose organizations to reputational damage and substantial legal penalties. Regulators are increasingly imposing fines to underline the importance of ethical AI usage in these formative years of technology adoption.
Minimizing bias falls under the umbrella of AI governance, particularly Model Governance. This process involves meticulously curating training data and employing robust data governance steps to ensure transparency, privacy protection, and fairness. This includes evaluating pre-processed data against strict criteria, conducting data clearance quality checks, and reviewing to guarantee only high-quality data is used for model training.
The process of data clearance ensures data collection meets established criteria, safeguarding against data poisoning by malicious actors. Pre-processing addresses data inconsistencies and formatting issues, while tokenization breaks down data into manageable pieces for model processing. These steps, combined with deep data modelling expertise, are crucial for rooting out bias, requiring ongoing vigilance and continuous improvement against trust metrics.
4CRisk highlighted that it adheres to rigorous model governance processes, including data clearance, preprocessing, and tokenization, to combat bias. Its AI models are trained on a curated corpus of regulatory, risk, and compliance data from public domain sources, ensuring they do not perpetuate harmful biases. The firm is committed to maintaining fairness and law compliance in our models, ensuring they remain free from discriminatory outcomes.
4CRisk said its models are designed to prioritize accuracy, minimizing data drift and continuously validating to maintain relevance and precision. Its AI products are built to be understandable and explainable, fostering trust through tools like confidence scores and visual mappings that illustrate AI decisions.
Moreover, the firm integrates human oversight at critical stages, allowing trained professionals to review and adjust model outputs. This human-in-the-loop approach ensures the company’s predictions are not only accurate but also aligned with expert judgment, reinforcing the reliability and trustworthiness of our AI products.
Copyright © 2024 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
