The Wolfsberg Group describes sanctions screening as a crucial method for detecting, preventing, and disrupting financial crimes, including sanctions risks.
According to Napier AI, this process involves comparing various data sources within a financial institution—such as customer details, transactions, and other records—against lists that indicate sanctions risks.
These lists typically comprise sanctions lists, Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) lists, adverse media lists from regulators or data vendors, and bespoke white/black lists created by financial institutions (FIs).
Despite its straightforward concept, the implementation of sanctions screening can be complex, especially when handling vast amounts of data. This complexity arises from the need to manage high volumes of transactions, the process of customer onboarding, and the challenges posed by sophisticated criminals attempting to bypass these controls.
Common indicators of inadequate screening processes include the generation of excessive false positives and false negatives. To mitigate these issues, it’s crucial to capture data in a clear, structured manner. More precise data helps reduce the chances of errors. For instance, recording first, middle, and last names separately can prevent ambiguity and improve match rates against external lists.
Implementing advanced filtering and secondary scoring systems, alongside sophisticated name-matching algorithms, helps to further reduce false positives.
Compliance analysts often face challenges in creating and testing financial crime typology rules. Without access to sandboxes, these teams can endure prolonged cycles of communication, rule explanation, and data sharing, which can be both costly and frustrating.
A modern anti-money laundering (AML) Software as a Service (SaaS) can address these issues by offering prebuilt typologies and sandbox environments, allowing compliance officers to test and develop rules in real-time without needing coding knowledge or software upgrades.
Integration issues across large, multi-jurisdictional organisations are another significant challenge. Adopting modular AML solutions that provide autonomy, customisable workflows, and scalability can effectively address these integration challenges. Such solutions support a varied risk appetite across different parts of the organisation within a unified structure, aligning with security requirements and regulatory commitments.
Finally, optimising alert discounting is crucial once a risk is identified. Leveraging AI and machine learning can greatly enhance the process of deciding which alerts to discount automatically and which to review manually. Additionally, addressing the lack of regulatory reporting knowledge among analysts is vital. Robust sandbox environments with version control can help bridge this gap, providing a central repository for all screening configurations and changes.
Copyright © 2024 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
