In today’s rapidly evolving landscape, organisations are exploring how to adopt AI Large Language Models (LLMs) for various applications.
According to 4CRisk.ai, however, many are facing challenges, particularly when it comes to ensuring greater security and privacy. A significant concern for enterprises is whether their sensitive information remains within their virtual walls. This question often leads to hesitation in embracing public LLMs for critical processes.
Another hurdle is the need for domain-specific knowledge. Organisations must ask if the models they are considering are trained on the corpus relevant to their particular needs. The issues of hallucinations, drifting, and data bias also pose significant challenges. Businesses must consider how accurate the model is and what the implications might be if erroneous information is provided to customers.
Explainability and transparency are essential in the risk and compliance sectors. Organisations need to understand how the AI works, verify the responses generated, and trust the results. Moreover, companies are looking for practical use cases. They require technologies that can assist with security, privacy, policy compliance, and other manual tasks, without needing to overhaul their entire operations.
Technical capabilities are another critical consideration. Enterprises must assess whether they need conversational AI, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), parsing, natural language processing (NLP), or other specialised functions. Additionally, there are distinctions in terms of complexity; organisations need to determine what level of precision or information retrieval is necessary for their operations.
Cost is a significant factor in scaling AI solutions. Companies must evaluate whether they possess the skills and budget to implement and maintain these models effectively. Understanding the return on investment (ROI) for high-priority use cases is crucial. This entails looking into the specific applications, associated benefits, costs, and the overall financial return expected from such projects.
Selecting the right language model requires balancing these numerous factors. While public LLMs often provide robust, out-of-the-box performance for various applications, they may not be the best fit for automating risk and compliance processes. Private Small Language Models (SLMs) can be a more practical and safer alternative, particularly those that are pre-trained on a closed domain, like 4CRisk’s Compliance models.
A comparison between Private SLMs and Public LLMs highlights the strengths of the former. Private, closed-domain small language models, such as those offered in 4CRisk products, are ideal for enterprises looking to leverage AI in their risk and compliance programs.
What differentiates 4CRisk.ai in this domain? The company prioritises speed, accuracy, and data privacy for its risk and compliance customers. Unlike many AI solutions utilising public LLMs, 4CRisk.ai has developed SMLs specifically tailored and pre-trained on carefully curated regulatory content. This focused approach enables the automation of various manual tasks within the risk and compliance sectors.
Additionally, 4CRisk.ai addresses common concerns associated with LLMs, such as data bias, intellectual property infringements, and hallucinations. The smaller model sizes also contribute to a significantly lower carbon footprint compared to LLMs, making them an environmentally friendly choice that can be deployed in dedicated environments.
Importantly, customer data is not used for training these language models. Instead, 4CRisk employs synthetic data generation techniques to refine their models. This practice ensures robust security and access control, tailored to business-defined roles and responsibilities. Notably, customer data remains confined within the client’s virtual walls, ensuring it is never exposed in the public domain.
Copyright © 2024 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
