The technological revolution is making the job of compliance officers increasingly intricate. From record-keeping to monitoring approved communication channels and adapting to the ever-changing world of social media advertising, the list of challenges seems endless. A burning question for many is the potential influence of large language models (LLMs) on their profession. Will LLMs simplify their tasks or add complexity?
Mark Roszak, Regulatory & Compliance Advisor to Saifr® recently sought to answer this question, offering the pros and cons for the use of LLMs within compliance.
LLMs bear the promise to bring about a radical change in compliance reviews and processes. Nevertheless, their integration presents unique problems. Given the broad spectrum of tasks compliance officers have to oversee, including the Bank Secrecy Act, Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, FINRA Rules, and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, among others depending on the institution, there is hope that LLMs can enhance existing procedures and alleviate compliance officers’ workload. This article will examine the potential advantages of LLMs and the apprehensions related to their application.
First, the possible benefits. LLMs can analyse massive volumes of data in real-time, enabling compliance officers to spot suspicious trends or deviations more effectively. Moreover, these machine learning models continually adapt and learn, enhancing accuracy over time and minimising false positives.
LLMs can automate tedious and recurrent tasks, freeing up compliance officers to concentrate on more valuable activities. Such automation could streamline compliance procedures, reduce human errors, and boost overall operational efficiency.
Additionally, LLMs can aid in surveillance and monitoring activities. By scrutinising communication trends, market data, advertising, and other internal data, LLMs could assist in identifying potential cases of insider trading, market manipulation, or other fraudulent activities.
Despite the numerous advantages of AI, its integration into the compliance field is not devoid of challenges and concerns.
One significant issue is the lack of transparency. LLMs often function as black boxes, making it challenging to comprehend the rationale behind their suggestions. This opacity raises accountability concerns and potential biases in compliance decisions.
Another issue relates to data quality and privacy. LLMs rely on data quality and availability. Hence, compliance officers must ensure that the data used is precise, reliable, and aligns with privacy regulations.
The rapid progression of LLMs also introduces regulatory challenges, necessitating the adherence to evolving regulations such as data protection, copyright issues, ethical AI guidelines, or disclosure requirements for AI tool usage.
Lastly, while LLMs could automate or augment human completion of compliance tasks, human oversight is critical. Compliance officers need to strike a balance between utilising LLMs’ capabilities and maintaining human judgement to make ethical and context-specific decisions.
In conclusion, compliance officers are navigating an increasingly complex and shifting regulatory landscape. While LLMs hold immense potential to streamline compliance processes, improve efficiency, and mitigate risks, they also come with their own set of challenges, including transparency, data quality, regulatory compliance, and human oversight. By proactively addressing these issues, financial institutions can fully utilise LLMs while maintaining robust and ethical compliance programs.
Read the full story here.
Keep up with all the latest FinTech news here.
Copyright © 2023 FinTech Global
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
